Well, that’s it. The first World Cup on the African continent is over, and in the final it was clear that Spain deserved to win it, becoming the ninth winner of a World Cup, the first side to win the tournament after losing their opening game (1-0 against Swizerland), the first European side to World Cup outside of Europe, the lowest-scoring winner of a World Cup so far (they scored only eight goals in the tournament) and the first winner of a World Cup in Africa. But what of the African teams?
With six African nations competing, the prospects seemed good for at least a couple of them to make an impression in this year’s tournament: but one by one, it became clear that this was not to be their time.
The hosts were unlucky to concede late in their opening game, earning them a draw that proved insufficient to propel them out of the group stage even after their 2-1 victory over France later on.
A promising Côte D’Ivoire got drawn in a “Group of Death” for the second tournament running and were edged out of a second-round place on goal difference after Portugal blasted North Korea 7-0.
Algeria, probably lucky to be in the tournament to start with thanks to their surprise 1-0 victory over African Cup of Nations holders Egypt in Omdurman, showed impressive team spirit at times and held a sub-par England side to a goalless draw but still proved unable to record a debut World Cup victory.
Cameroon fell victim to their own poor preparation and infighting, losing all of their group-stage games in spite of being Africa’s highest-ranked team and boasting the prodigious talent of Samuel Eto’o, among others.
Nigeria had high hopes and high expectations coming into the tournament, but a poor run of form, poor discipline against Greece and some desperately bad luck against South Korea led to a first-round dismissal that Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan called an embarrassment to the nation.
All of which leaves us with Ghana, who this year equalled the best previous result for an African nation in reaching the quarter-finals, after beating the USA 2-1 in the last eight. The real injustice here is, of course, that they did enough to be the first African nation to reach the semifinals, and would have been there if it were not for a blatant, cynical handball on the Uruguayan goal line from Luis Suarez to deny them a last-minute winner. Asamoah Gyan missed the resulting spot-kick, and there was not enough time left in the game for Suarez’s red card to make any difference: In the resulting penalty shootout, the South Americans took the game 4-2.
Regardless of the outcome for the host continent however, the tournament’s organisation has been widely recognised as a success story. South Africa has shown that it can host a major international sporting event without any major problems, giving itself- and the continent of Africa- some excellent positive publicity in the process as well as attracting and successfully managing huge numbers of tourists from all around the world. The next question is- where do they go from here?
The infrastructure improvements and sporting arenas constructed in order to make this World Cup possible have the potential to provide a real benefit to South Africa, but a great many of the jobs created in their construction and operation for the tournament will now, in the short term at least, be lost as the howls of the ubiquitous vuvuzelas fall silent and the stadia lie empty; waiting, perhaps, for the next major sporting event to visit this country.
The World Cup has been a success story so far, but it must be made clear that this is only the beginning. Its legacy in South Africa will be judged, in the long run, by its lasting effect on the nation and not just what happened over five weeks in 2010. The future holds promise, but we are not there yet.